#Newtek lightwave 3d 9 plus#
I don't know anyone in architecture, industrial design, graphic design, animation, or video editing that doesn't keep their workstation vertically, who doesn't also hate vertical optical drives, and also often have two of those plus a card reader. The brutalist architecture may have convenient handles, but to me is a clunker, both visually and in features. Still, the T5600 situation is better than the impending Mac Dustbin Pro.Ģ. My mother's 2010 dual-core Athlon X2 in a $39 case, "Grandma's TurboKitten 3000", has more expansion bays. I can understand the trends toward more compact cases, and even the need to pander to styling and branding, but the TX600 series is inexecusably short on drive bays.
I imagine these tests are complex and time-consuming, but it would have provided perspective if at least one direct competitor from HP and/or Lenovo appeared.Ī couple of comments on the T5600 design.ġ. More would have been revealed if the P500X used something like a GTX 680 (In other words,about 2nd from the top of their respective lines) rather than a Quadro 2000 which is two generations past and in effect, just a much lower line ancestor of the K5000. The systems compared were, however, not at the same level relative to their categories. To others it might matter, but in my design, I could care less about AA I am just happy when SolidWorks does not crash.Ī very good and welcome review. I just might run SpecviewPerf 11 on my system to see how it performs. Now SW Simulations and PhotoView360 is a different story. How odd is that?Ĭorrect if I am wrong, but as far as I know the basic S*#tWorks is not optimized for multi-threading (hence I am only running an i7 3820 and anything higher would not benefit the performance). In fact, SolidWorks performs better with AA on. The tests seem evenly split between single- and multi-threaded workloads, and some of them incur little or no hit from AA, which points to something other than the GPU bottlenecking performance.
#Newtek lightwave 3d 9 upgrade#
This sure has makes me think twice about wanting to upgrade my 2000 to a K4000. 11768418 said:Am I reading this right, in the SPECviewperf 11 bench graph: the ($480-ish) PNY Quadro 2000 (P500X) beat the ($ 1800-ish) PNY Quadro K5000 by significant margins in the SW-02, as well as some other ones as well.
0 kommentar(er)
